73·STUDY

Study guide · T9

Antennas and Feed Lines: Getting Your Signal Actually Out of the Radio

Why a mismatched antenna wastes real transmitter power, what SWR is actually measuring, and the handful of antenna types every new Technician should be able to recognize.

Published 2026-08-28 · Last updated 2026-08-28

A transmitter can put out a clean, powerful signal and still fail to get much of it on the air if the antenna system isn't matched to it properly. The core concept underneath most of this subelement is impedance matching: your transmitter, typically 50 ohms, the feed line connecting it to the antenna, and the antenna itself all need compatible impedance for power to transfer efficiently. When they don't match, some of the transmitter's power reflects back toward the transmitter instead of radiating from the antenna, which is wasted power at best and, at worst, can damage the transmitter's output stage.

SWR, standing wave ratio, is the number that quantifies how good or bad that match is. A perfect match is expressed as 1:1, meaning no power is reflected. As the mismatch gets worse, the ratio climbs, 2:1, 3:1, and so on, and more power is being reflected rather than radiated. An SWR meter, an inexpensive and common piece of station equipment, measures this directly and is usually the first diagnostic tool a ham reaches for when a station that used to work well suddenly doesn't, a damaged feed line connector or a storm-damaged antenna element often shows up first as a spike in SWR.

Feed line itself isn't a passive, lossless wire, different feed line types (coaxial cable being by far the most common in amateur use) have different loss characteristics that get worse at higher frequencies and over longer runs. This is why the "just use a longer piece of coax, it's fine" instinct can quietly cost you real signal strength on VHF/UHF especially, where loss per foot is meaningfully higher than on HF for the same cable type. Choosing an appropriately low-loss cable for the frequency and run length in use is a real, practical design decision, not just a budget one.

A handful of antenna types are worth being able to recognize by name and rough shape because they show up repeatedly: the dipole (a simple, horizontal antenna fed at its center, essentially two straight wire elements in a line), the vertical (a single element mounted vertically, typically with a ground plane, favored for omnidirectional coverage and simple installation), the Yagi (a directional beam antenna with multiple parallel elements, common for both VHF/UHF weak-signal work and HF DXing), and the J-pole (a popular simple vertical variant for VHF/UHF, often homemade). Each trades off differently on gain, directionality, and ease of construction, and the exam pool tests recognizing these tradeoffs more than memorizing exact specifications.

The practical thread running through all of it: antenna and feed line choices are where a huge fraction of a station's real-world performance gets decided, often more than the transmitter itself. A modest transmitter feeding a well-matched, well-placed antenna through low-loss feed line will consistently outperform a powerful transmitter fighting a poor match and lossy cable. This subelement is testing whether you understand that tradeoff, not just whether you can name the components.

Related

Getting your signal into the air and back out again: antenna types, feed lines, SWR, and why a mismatched antenna wastes your transmitter power.